On Dec 23, 2023, at 21:11, Michael Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > Like Hannes, I disagree with the assertion that the IANA "Named Information > Hash Algorithm Registry" is not well-maintained. Like any other IANA > registry, if you want a new entry, create a specification and register it. > I've created many specification to just that, such as RFC 8230 and RFC 8812. > If you have an itch, scratch it yourself! It's the IETF way!
Sure. It just hasn’t happened as much as it has for the COSE algorithms registry, which is the dose of reality I would like to add. But my point really is: > Finally, like Hannes, I would prefer that we continue use the same hash > algorithms registry as the JWK Thumbprint URI spec [RFC 9728] does for the > same purpose. Unnecessary differences when doing the same thing should be > avoided. And I would prefer that the thumbprints use the same Hash registry that all other COSE specs use. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
