Hi Éric, Thanks for taking the time to review the specification. I've made the references to JWS and JWE informative, per your suggestion.
These changes are in https://github.com/selfissued/draft-ietf-cose-typ-header-parameter/pull/10 (as are changes motivated by two other reviews). I plan to merge it and publish mid-day Wednesday US Pacific Time unless I hear objections so that the new draft is ready for Thursday's IESG telechat. Best wishes, -- Mike -----Original Message----- From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 6:08 AM To: The IESG <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-typ-header-parameter-04: (with COMMENT) Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-cose-typ-header-parameter-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-typ-header-parameter/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the work done in this document. I just wonder RFC 7515 and 7516 are normative or informative though. The latter seems more appropriate to me. _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
