Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* cose-wg/CBOR-certificates (+1/-4/💬10)
 1 issues created:
 - Remove the support of PEN (by xipki)
https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/204
 10 issues received 10 new comments:
 - #203 Error in "Example Encoding of Extensions" (1 by gselander)
https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/203 - #197 Deterministic Encoding of an Extension (1 by gselander) https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/197 - #190 Extension and Extended Key Usage for Certificate Transparency (RFC 6962) (1 by gselander) https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/190 - #189 How to encode extension / attribute if the extension / attribute value cannot be CBOR encoded? (1 by gselander) https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/189 - #184 Extend the syntax to allow PEN for all OBJECT IDENTIFIER fields. (1 by gselander) https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/184 - #183 Encoding of ~oid / pen (1 by gselander) https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/183 - #182 Missing the hex-encoded C509 certificate for the CAB HTTPS certificate examples (1 by gselander) https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/182 - #179 Missing the method to compute the Subject Key Identifier in Native C509 Certificate (1 by xipki) https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/179 - #174 Extend `SubjectDirectoryAttributes` to cover the attributeType `pen` (1 by xipki) https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/174 - #173 Encoding of Authority Key Identifier (1 by xipki) https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/173
 4 issues closed:
- Encoding of Authority Key Identifier https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/173 - Extend `SubjectDirectoryAttributes` to cover the attributeType `pen` https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/174 - Encoding of ~oid / pen https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/183 - Extend the syntax to allow PEN for all OBJECT IDENTIFIER fields. https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/184


Pull requests
-------------
* cose-wg/CBOR-certificates (+5/-0/💬1)
 5 pull requests submitted:
 - Removed PEN (#204), and added field name to CDDL of ASIdOrRange and 
AddressRange (#196) (by xipki)
https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/pull/209 - "Simplify the CDDL of Name" as in #195 (by xipki) https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/pull/208 - Attribute domainComponent as in https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certi… (by xipki) https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/pull/207 - PR for challegePassword as in #186 (by xipki) https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/pull/206 - Deterministic Encoding of an Attribute, #198 (by xipki) https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/pull/205
 1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
 - #200 Extended CDDL to allow PEN for all OBJECT IDENTIFIER fields. (1 by 
gselander)
https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/pull/200

Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates
* https://github.com/cose-wg/Charter
* https://github.com/cose-wg/cose-rfc8152bis
* https://github.com/cose-wg/countersign
* https://github.com/cose-wg/X509
_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to