Carsten, I stand corrected. Sometimes the sheer size of RFC 8949 puts me on
the wrong track :(
Referring to draft-ietf-cbor-cde seems like an excellent idea.
Cheers,
Anders
On 2024-07-07 08:40, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On 7. Jul 2024, at 06:21, Anders Rundgren <[email protected]> wrote:
- Referring to 4.2.1 is insufficient, you need 4.2.3 as well. Related:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-cde/
Section 4.2.3 of RFC 8949 describes a legacy format that should not be used for
new protocols.
Section 4.2.1 is the one we want to reference here.
If the structures can contain floating point values (e.g., via a new registry
entry), some of 4.2.2 may be needed.
(If deterministic serialization for general data structures is needed it would
be best to normatively reference draft-ietf-cbor-cde. Do not restate or
second-guess.)
Grüße, Carsten
_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
