Thanks for the support and feedback. We've incorporated changes from the 
feedback, and of course welcome any more.

Delta from what's published on DataTracker:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?doc_1=draft-steele-cose-hash-envelope&url_2=https://OR13.github.io/draft-steele-cose-hash-envelope/draft-steele-cose-hash-envelope.txt

Thanks,
Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Bryce <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2024 9:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [COSE] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-steele-cose-hash-envelope

Hi all,

Just want to state my support for the adoption of 
draft-steele-cose-hash-envelope 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-steele-cose-hash-envelope/

Based on practical experience working towards implementations of the SCITT WG 
drafts, it provides a clear option for situations where transmitting data 
inline is not appropriate or desired, and where verification and storage of 
data are distinct concerns.

Thanks!

Robin

_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to