Hi all,

To try and reduce the burden on the authors of responding to issue 20

https://github.com/cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs/issues/20

I've raised PR's for each item I believe is actionable from the review. I've 
tried to make it so they can just be individually rejected as not useful or 
applied directly and independently.

The PR's marked "issue #20" here 
https://github.com/cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs/pulls are my 
suggestions for how my previous review could be addressed.

Even where rejected, I would be super appreciative of even "non normative" 
responses where peoples time allows.

Cheers,

Robin


_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to