Felix and Robin, thank you for your comments on this document, and especially the pull requests!
I'm fine recommending both payload's be detached for consistency if that is what the group recommends. I filed https://github.com/cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs/issues/30 to track these discussions. I hope others will comment on this issue. Are there any objections to recommending the payload be detached for consistency proofs? Regards, OS On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 8:18 AM A.J. Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 8:39 AM Felix Linker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Robin, >> >> Thanks for your comments! Having read them, I am more confident that I >> correctly understand what the draft intends to say. I opened a PR >> addressing the editing comments from my review: Editing after review by >> felixlinker · Pull Request #29 · cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs >> (github.com) >> <https://github.com/cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs/pull/29> >> > > I review your proposed changes and I support adding in those edits. > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > -- ORIE STEELE Chief Technology Officer www.transmute.industries <https://transmute.industries>
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
