> On Aug 19, 2024, at 1:04 PM, Anders Rundgren <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 2024-08-19 21:32, lgl island-resort.com wrote: >>> On Aug 19, 2024, at 12:25 PM, Anders Rundgren >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> No CBOR signing format needs determinism or canonicalization for the >>> payload. > > Pardon me, I managed to remove the > from your statement :( > >> Which do you mean? >> 1) No, I disagree with you.CBOR signing formats do need determinism. >> 2) Yes, I agree with you, Determinism is not need for signing formats. > > None of this but as I wrote immediately below the mentioned line, signature > implementations that do not work directly with imput buffers depend on > determinism.
OK. I see. It's another form of “independent (re)construction”. LL _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
