Hi Paul, I've not been able to keep up with that discussion, but I believe you are correct.
At some point we will probably see a similar discussion for ML-KEM and x-wing. It would be unfortunate if COSE/JOSE and LAMPs ended up diverging on the bare key and signature formats for PQC. Regards, OS On Tue, Mar 11, 2025, 11:33 AM Paul Wouters <paul.wouters= [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > The document looks fine to me, but I'd like to discuss one item. > > It seems private keys MUST be specified as seed. The document justifies > this by linking it to the lamps equivalent doc. But it is my understanding > that there is a discussion there on allowing a format that encompasses seed > or expanded key. I think it would be good to await the outcome there and > ensure capabilities in the specifications are matching. > > Does that make sense, or did I misinterpret anything? > > Paul > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
