Hi Anders, I think you are doing great work documenting your implementation work. I would love to have documents like this reviewed, fixed, and be published as informational documents from the CBOR WG.
Unfortunately, you are dressing this as “UNIVERSAL CBOR”, which it isn’t. You are also not citing the normative documents that are the basis of this work. The weird semi-retaining signature concept in Appendix B might have its applications, but it mostly combines the disadvantages of the retaining and non-retaining approaches to object signatures. This part is most definitely not UNIVERSAL. Giving it grandiose, official-sounding names such as CSF and CEF doesn’t help either. I don’t know why you are pursuing this false advertising. It sincerely doesn’t help your work. Instead it is simply devaluing it. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
