Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-cose-03-03: Block
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-cose/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- BLOCK: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the simpler COSE charter. I have nevertheless a blocking comment (easy to fix): please specify the intended status of the document. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- And also some suggestions: s/NIST/US NIST/ Aren't `The WG will evaluate, and potentially adopt, documents dealing with algorithms that would fit the criteria of being IETF consensus algorithms.` and `The specification of algorithms in COSE is limited to those in RFCs, active CFRG or IETF WG documents, or algorithms which have been positively reviewed by the CFRG.` both similar and different? Either remove the duplication or remove the contradictions. Unsure whether `positively reviewed by the CFRG` is well defined, is it published in the IRTF stream ? _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
