Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-cose-03-03: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-cose/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Paragraph 2 COSE has been picked up and is being used both by a number of groups with which it will coordinate its progress. This includes groups within the IETF (e.g., ACE, CORE, JOSE, LAMPS, ANIMA, and SUIT) and outside the IETF (e.g., W3C and FIDO). There are a number of implementations, both open source and private, now in existence. Realizing some of this text was in the currently approved -03 charter version. -- Consider if this text is needed? It doesn’t scope anything the WG does. -- What does “coordinate its progress” really commit the WG to do? -- If there are organizations or WG to work with, declaratively list them. _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
