Hi all, This document looks good and I have issued the IETF Last Call.
Two comments: this doesn't parse: This hash becomes the payload of a COSE-Sign1. When signed with a signature algorithm that is parameterized via a hash function, such as ECDSA with SHA384, the to be signed structure as described in Section 4.4 of RFC9052. probably this was meant: as described -> is as described I don't think [I-D.draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals] can be infornative if you use it in a section called "Terminology". I think it should be normative. Paul
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
