Sipos, Brian J. <[email protected]> wrote: > In looking through C509 related header parameters, I notice that there is no > C509 equivalent to the X509 sender identifiers defined in RFC 9360 [1]. Is > this omission intentional? Is there expected to eventually be a "c5c-sender" > equivalent parameter?
I was confused by your question. x5*-sender are headers for COSE, and they contain certificates (or chains or bags or sets or URLs pointing ...) C509 is a compression of RFC5280/PKIX certificate using CBOR with a human created "dictionary"... I guess that you are referring to the (STILL, VERY POORLY NAMED) Natively Signed C509 format, which *is* COSE, and thus it could take on such headers. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
