Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: >> I prefer: >> 1. CBOR-compressed PKIX(5280) certificate. >> -and- >> 2. CBOR-native-encoded certificate.
> (Assuming we at some point find a better word for “native”):
Yeah.
COSE-signed certificate. CSC?
Would be nice to maintain the fact that it's semantically identical to
RFC5280, just not interoperable.
(Sure, it's a superset, and one could in some ecosystems have a mix of the
two, but generically, that's not going to work)
COSE-signed PKIX certificate: CSKC?
I'm all for this, btw.
But, we have to get the naming right.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
