On October 10, 2025 12:28:38 p.m. EDT, Tim Hollebeek <[email protected]> wrote: > >Seeing C509 just as an alternative encoding for traditional ASN.1 certs, and >that both of them basically encode the same X.509 profile(s) and follow >similar rules makes more sense to me. So I would put them under the general >PKIX umbrella.
The problem is that there are two things in this document, an invertible (compression), and a re-encoding that has a different signature. The document does not name them well, "type 1" and "type 2", I think. We need to better than that. _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
