Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The example at https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope-08.html#section-4.1 appears to repeat at least one element, about the generation of the hash as an adjacent file. Is this file at all relevant to the example, despite being mentioned twice? It seems as if the only relevant piece is that this *is* the hash of the source file. NIT: Section 5.3, "Verifiers that not have" => "Verifiers that do not have" _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
