I am also in favour of adoption and agree that it shouldn’t slow down C509. One of my students at the University of Glasgow is implementing C509 in C, and this test-vector draft has already helped a lot. I am sure it will be quite useful for others who try to implement or use C509.
Best, Shahid Professor in Cybersecurity UofG UK | RISE Sweden On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 at 18:09, Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec= [email protected]> wrote: > I am in favor of adoption. > > Provided it does not slow down draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert. :) > > On 11/18/25 12:50 PM, Michael Jones wrote: > > This note starts a two-week call for adoption for Test Vectors for CBOR > Encoded X.509 (C509) Certificates > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lspm-cose-c509-test-vectors/. > Please indicate here by Tuesday, December 2, 2025 whether you are in favor > of adoption or not, and the reasons for your position. > > > > Thank you, > > -- Ivo and > Mike > > COSE > co-chairs > > > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
