See my comment on this PR
https://github.com/cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-hpke/pull/132#pullrequestreview-3843615116.
I believe that we should solve this by referencing draft-ietf-hpke-hpke like
JOSE HPKE does. A breaking change is neither necessary nor would it be helpful
at this stage of the specification’s development. I’ll also note that such a
change would break the intentional alignment of mechanisms between COSE HPKE
and JOSE HPKE, and so would need to be considered in the
cross-specification/cross-working-group context as well.
Sincerely,
-- Mike
From: Ivaylo Petrov <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 12:20 PM
To: tirumal reddy <[email protected]>
Cc: cose <[email protected]>; Cose Chairs Wg <[email protected]>;
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [jose] WGLC: draft-ietf-cose-hpke-20 (Ends 2026-02-11)
Dear all,
Thank you all for reviewing the draft and providing your feedback.
As a quick update, I am aware of at least one remaining PR from Laurence that
should be addressed before we proceed with the publication request:
https://github.com/cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-hpke/pull/132.
Best regards,
Ivaylo
On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 5:41 AM tirumal reddy
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I have reviewed the COSE HPKE draft and it is ready to progress to the next
stage (other than the pending issue raised by Laurence).
Cheers,
-Tiru
On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 at 01:44, Ivaylo Petrov
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Dear COSE WG members,
This message starts a WG Last Call (WGLC) for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-hpke/
Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceeding with the
publication of this document by replying to this email keeping
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
in copy. Please provide rationale for support and explanations or suggestions
for objections.
Please note there is a parallel call going on in JOSE working group for the
document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-hpke-encrypt/
Please consider reviewing both documents.
This Working Group Last Call ends on 2026-02-11
Thank you,
-- Mike and Ivo
COSE co-chairs
Please note:
Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1].
Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions
of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be
found at [3].
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
