A question for those that are running CoSign in production, and whatever developers happen to be lurking: if you were installing CoSign from scratch today, would you run 2.0.3 or push for one of the 2.1 release candidates? I'm curious as to what others think on this subject, as we're planning a rollout at Penn.

Thanks,
-- Jorj

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =-=-=-
Jorj Bauer                                  |         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Director of Networking                      |         3330 Walnut St.
School of Engineering and Applied Science | Levine Building, Room 160
University of Pennsylvania                  |     Philadelphia, PA 19104
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =-=-=-

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Cosign-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cosign-discuss

Reply via email to