Hello Ron,
Many thanks for your reply and the  interpretation of the descriptions of the 
soil. I was particularly interested in the grazing system you mentioned and the 
involvement of communities in it’s management. You have also given me a much 
better picture of what the land was really like and the problems Thomas faced. 
I have visited the area and the fields seem pretty rough (seen through a 
townies eyes) although there was another McCay farm in the area which was about 
10 cunningham acres and seemed a little better, and is still farmed today. I 
also looked on Google maps and saw areas which were very water logged with few 
signs of cultivation while others look as if they would be used for pasture.. I 
think I will go and have another look on my next visit. It is fascinating to 
compare the Griffiths maps with Googles aerial views. The original fields are 
still clearly visible.
Thomas is the earliest ancestor that I can positively identify from the Tithe 
Applotments and church records. By the time of the Griffith Valuation, his two 
sons had extended their farms to about 24 statute acres each, with no shared 
leases, although the land was still the poorest in the area. I did find a 
conversion for Cunningham acres – 10 cunningham acres was about 13 statute 
acres, so each farm had probably almost doubled in size. Interestingly, and 
possibly due to the effects of the great famine, almost all their neighbours in 
Rabstown had changed. By the mid nineteenth century, only the McCays and the 
Flanagans, of the TAB tenants, were still leaseholders.  The records relating 
to land have allowed me to track their progress through most of the nineteenth 
century into the twentieth and now I am trying to add a little more information 
into the lives they probably lead.
Your comments and insight have helped me to do that. Thankyou again.
Regards Marion (nee McCay)

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: Ron McCoy via CoTyroneList
Sent: 19 October 2018 00:47
To: cotyronelist@cotyroneireland.com
Cc: Ron McCoy
Subject: Re: [CoTyroneMailingList] Gt gt grandfathers farm

Hi Marion
I am guilty of being a farmer and my last name is McCoy a version of McCay. I 
have also walked a lot of farms in Ireland but do not claim to be an expert on 
any thing you have mentioned below. Having said that I can give it a go until 
someone who is more knowledgeable comes along and corrects my poor thoughts. 
You say it is 39 Cunningham acres shared by four farmers. That is hard to know 
how big that is because the Cunningham acre was different in different 
Scotch/Ulster communities. As you know the Irish acre was about 27% bigger per 
side for a  60% increase over a Statue acre. You are right about the potatoes 
and oats. These were grown in any shape plot they could find and often close to 
the house to provide food and sale if possible. At the height of the many 
potato famines Irish potatoes were still advertised on the Docks of Quebec and 
Montreal for sale. The first description is mountain arable and heathy pasture, 
shallow    white gravely sand subsoil. The land is arable so it has been 
cleared and has been plowed at one time. Likely rocks picked and fences build. 
However by the description as being heathy pasture and shallow I take it to 
likely mean at one time there was lots of erosion and the fields played out 
quickly. Heathy land especially on the hill sides are usually covered with low 
growing shrubs which are the devil to take out again and are extremely 
invasive. With out an aerial map it is hard to tell but probably the land is on 
a steep slope and may be part of what is known as a ladder grazing system. The 
population of Ireland was about 8 million people to this day it still has not 
regained that number. Every inch of land was being cleared and utilized. The 
ladder grazing systems took old fields that were unsuited for plowing any 
longer and used them for seasonal grazing. Farmers usually together took the 
cattle to the top fields of the hills early in the spring were the top field 
was dry and the early grass already growing. As each field below grew and got 
dry enough they would move the cattle down the ladder to the bottom of the 
hill. This system was well established and communities worked together to mend 
fences, maintain fields and share pasture land.
The next description is of a deep arable soil which usually means that their is 
a good depth of top soil. Moory land is usually wet and boggy often containing 
high levels of peat and high organic mater which has a number of difficulties 
in farming. The Irish farmers dealt with wet bogey lands by ditching and 
creating what was known as ,"Irish Drains,." These were the for runner of our 
modern tile drains. They would dig a net work of ditches and lay stones in them 
with flat stones on top. The water would find its way to the spaces between the 
stones and flow to a near by stream via the Irish drain. This took incredible 
craftsmanship and hand labour and many of them still work today however once 
you had improved the land this way the tax or rent would jump considerably. In 
some ways times have not changed...
Hope that is of some help
cheers
Ron McCoy

On 2018-10-18 12:22 PM, Marion via CoTyroneList wrote:
Hello All,
Are there any farmers out there? This is a description of the area where my 
Great gt Grandfather, Thomas McCay, farmed in the Townland Valuation . He 
shared about 39 Cunningham acres with four other farmers in the first area and 
had about 2 acres in the second . The land is obviously pretty poor and I 
wondered if anyone could suggest how this land would have been used at that 
time. From my reading I guess he grew some oats and potatoes and used the 
pasture for some kind of livestock but I would be interested in any comments 
from people with more knowledge than me.
The Townland Valuation 1828-40 
This was carried out by the Ordnance Survey and provided a very detailed 
description of the land in each townland. On June 20th 1833 it was the turn of 
Rabstown to undergo this process. The townland was divided into 5 areas, noted 
on an accompanying map, and each described and valued. The area in which Thomas 
shared land with a group of farmers and in which Archibald's farm was situated 
was probably area 3 and the following description is given:
 
'3 A recd (reclaimed) mountain arable                                           
                                                   
 and heathy pasture, shallow,                                                   
                                                                                
                            white gravely sand subsoil'
 
The value or rate for the land in this area is given as 3s per statute acre, 
later increased to 3/6. This was by far the least valuable land in Rabstown, 
other areas being rated at between 9/6 and 14s in the initial valuation. 
Thomas' land in Glentown was obviously much better. It was in area 7 and 
surveyed on June 24th. The description is as follows:
 
'7 A good free deep arable 1/3  
 deep 2/3  a moory arable  of moderate depth and part exposed                   
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                       Also 
reclaimed bog wet and heathy pasture’                                           
                                                                            
 
This was valued initially at 11/6 per statute acre, later being raised to 12/6, 
while the reclaimed bog and heathy pasture was valued at 3/6. 
 
Many Thanks 
Marion Shephard
 
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
 



_______________________________________________
CoTyroneList mailing list
CoTyroneList@cotyroneireland.com
http://mail.cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com


_______________________________________________
CoTyroneList mailing list
CoTyroneList@cotyroneireland.com
http://mail.cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/
(_internal_name)s

Reply via email to