Aurélien, I agree with you the python app is good and that is probably why I never got around to try Erica where I am sure Beniot did a good job with. Compatibility with a file structure would not be complicated, I would think, but the advandage I see in Ddoc is that we skipped Github fir ddocs because it actually works well in a team too. Instead of folders in a file it holds a couch document as the source document and outputs projects as ddoc.
If someone you tried all three alternatives could make a comparison and feature matrix that would be great johs > On 5. nov. 2015, at 10.40, Aurélien Bénel <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Is there a plan to install one implementation automatically with CouchDB? >>> That would be great. >>> However the chosen version should pass tests to be sure that it implements >>> all the features that are used by people on a daily basis. I had bad >>> experiences earlier when I tried to replace python couchapp tool with >>> alternatives. >> ermouth has created this tool which I can recommend <http://ddoc.me/> >> It is a IDE in the form of a single design document so it is convenient to >> have in any couch database where you need it. (…) The beauty of it is that >> it is offline based on PouchDB so you have a super UX > > Thanks Johs. This is an interesting project. However a must-have for us is : > - to keep our git-based folders (with the same structure if possible), > - to use our favorite editors (MacVim for me, other editors for > collaborators), > - to push the app with a command line (so that it can be launched by > Travis.ci for example). > > As a matter of fact, we’re quite happy with python couchapp! > > The only problem with it is that its installation takes 16s on Travis.ci and > that it is regularly broken and hard to reinstall on MacOS X updates. > > > Regards, > > Aurélien
