> So if we could have a performance booster, say 5x, I‘d use > couchapps not only for small things or interims.
Do you mean your workaround on JavaScript single-threading like it is usally the case in any other environment, even in angular2 or react, by using more CouchDB design documents simultanously is not fast enogh? On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 12:24 AM, ermouth <ermo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > from someone reaching the end of couchapp > > possibilities by developing a software stack which does'nt need local > > installation > > Thanks. Reaching the end means going back with new experience. > > Ddoc Lab is able to generate attaches with npm package tarballs, and npm > allows direct install from CouchDB. I mean deploying from Couch to FS, not > vice versa as we usually do. That is my "going back" from Couch to FS-based > solutions: FS apps still follow data. > > Now I‘m thinking about composing kinda node.js module, able to augment > query server in part of show, list, update and, possibly, reduce. > > There exist nice set of modules like pouchdb/pouchdb-list. I gonna try to > combine couple of them, and, intercepting appropriate requests by node.js, > exec lists and similar queries inside node.js. Just for an experiment, to > see what it gives. > > Actually (couchapp + JSrewrite + PouchDB) architecture is pretty nice and > even attractive in terms of stability and, well, purity – but lacks > performance. So if we could have a performance booster, say 5x, I‘d use > couchapps not only for small things or interims. > > ermouth > -- -- Dipl.-Inf. Harald R. Kisch Falkenstraße 19C 81541 München Germany Mobil DE: +49 (0) 176 56 58 58 38 Skype: harald.kisch Mail: haraldki...@gmail.com
