Hey Matt, Thanks: is "pillowfight" available as a command utility eg
Name cbc — Couchbase command line utility Synopsis *cbc help* *cbc cat* [common options] [-r [*VALUE*]] *key*… *cbc cp* [common options] [-p] [-r *NUMBER*] [-m *NUMBER*] [-j] *filename*… *cbc create* [common options] [-f *FLAGS*] [-e *VALUE*] [-a] *key* *cbc observe* [common options] *key*… *cbc flush* [common options] *cbc hash* [common options] [-f *FILENAME*] *key*… *cbc lock* [common options] [-e *VALUE*] *key*… *cbc unlock* [common options] *key* *cas*… *cbc rm* [common options] *key*… *cbc stats* [common options] [*stat group*]… *cbc verify* [common options] *filename*… *cbc version* [common options] *cbc verbosity* [common options] *level* *cbc view* [common options] [-c] [-d *DATA*] [-X *METHOD*] *query* *cbc admin* [common options] [-c] [-d *DATA*] [-X *METHOD*] *query* *cbc bucket-create* [common options] [-B *TYPE*] [-q *QUOTA*] [-a *AUTH*] [-s *PASSWORD*] [-r *NUMBER*] [-p *PORT*] *bucketname*… *cbc bucket-delete* [common options] *bucket*… *cbc bucket-flush* [common options] *bucket*… *cbc pillowfight* [-?] [-h *HOST*] [-b *BUCKET*] [-u *USER*] [-P *PASSWORD*] [-T] [-i *ITERATIONS*] [-I *ITEMS*] [-p *PREFIX*] [-t *THREADS*] [-Q *INSTANCES*] [-l] [-s *SEED*] [-r *RATIO*] [-m *MIN*] [-M *MAX*] [-d] but when I try to run this I don't see the pillowfight option C:\Program Files\Couchbase\Server\bin>couchbase-cli.exe -help usage: couchbase-cli COMMAND CLUSTER [OPTIONS] CLUSTER is --cluster=HOST[:PORT] or -c HOST[:PORT] COMMANDs include server-list list all servers in a cluster server-info show details on one server server-add add one or more servers to the cluster server-readd readd a server that was failed over rebalance start a cluster rebalancing rebalance-stop stop current cluster rebalancing rebalance-status show status of current cluster rebalancing failover failover one or more servers cluster-init set the username,password and port of the cluster cluster-edit modify cluster settings node-init set node specific parameters bucket-list list all buckets in a cluster bucket-create add a new bucket to the cluster bucket-edit modify an existing bucket bucket-delete delete an existing bucket bucket-flush flush all data from disk for a given bucket bucket-compact compact database and index data setting-compaction set auto compaction settings setting-notification set notification settings setting-alert set email alert settings setting-autofailover set auto failover settings setting-xdcr set xdcr related settings user-manage manage read only user xdcr-setup set up XDCR connection xdcr-replicate xdcr operations help show longer usage/help and examples On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 7:23:38 PM UTC, Matt Ingenthron wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > How is your bucket set up? > > Note that by default, you'll have replication set to 1, so when you go > from one node to two nodes, you actually increase the reliability and thus > the work a bit without actually increasing net capacity. > > It may also be helpful if you give us a sense of the system under test and > the numbers you're seeing. Note that there is a package distributed with > libcouchbase <http://www.couchbase.com/communities/c/getting-started>that > includes a workload generator named pillowfight. There's also a Java > workload generator named RoadRunner <https://github.com/daschl/RoadRunner> > . > > Thanks, > > Matt > > From: asdf9898 <[email protected] <javascript:>> > Reply-To: "[email protected] <javascript:>" < > [email protected] <javascript:>> > Date: Thursday, January 30, 2014 4:00 AM > To: "[email protected] <javascript:>" > <[email protected]<javascript:> > > > Subject: couchbase scale out performance > > Hello > > I am new to nosql in general and would like some advice on couchbase and > other similar technologies. > > I have done some performance testing of a number of technologies and find > the same results with each. > > When I do x inserts on a single node I get better performance than when I > add a second node. > > Read-performance is much better than insert performance but again a single > node performs better than 2 nodes. > > I then thought that if I add the URIs in the buildConnection > > URI server = new URI(addresses); > ArrayList<URI> serverList = new ArrayList<URI>(); > serverList.add(server); > CouchbaseClient client = new CouchbaseClient( > serverList, "default", ""); > > In other words by explicitly telling the client about the second node it > should cause double performance but sadly I just got maybe an extra 10% > > I then thought if I double the number of client threads because I now have > two servers to target it would double performance but again no: just a > slight increase. > > So in summary : would adding an extra node cause an increase or decrease > in throughput (both reading and inserts) ? > > And I am getting the same behaviour using other well known nosql > technologies too. > > Many thanks in advance. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Couchbase" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > -- > Matt Ingenthron > Couchbase, Inc. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Couchbase" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
