On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:40 PM, M. Nunberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yep. I guess I can agree with that; so we'd have couchbase:// and > couchbase+dnssrv:// -- but i think those would be it? > Not necessarily. But most importantly is that it proves that we should not omit scheme. Other things that might be different namespaces is whether you're specifying memcached endpoint (for cccp) or http endpoint. It doesn't look like CCCP is a fully "done deal" given that people are asking more from it which it does not currently have and given http is capable of solving problem as well. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Couchbase" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
