On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:17:55AM -0700, David Reid wrote: > It's because we no longer use content-type to describe the programming > language, which always seemed dubious to me anyway.
Not sure, but I think this might be a mistake. >From IRC I gather that the content type of views POSTed to CouchDB is now indicated with a "language" attribute in the request body. This feels a little be RPCish, should we not be leveraging the HTTP level stuff for specifying the content type of views POSTed to CouchDB? I would be interested to hear Sam's opinion on this. > Also since a lot of the possible languages for a view server to use > don't have IANA assigned media types we'd just be making stuff up. I see no problem with minting new media types for this. -- Noah Slater - The Apache Software Foundation <http://www.apache.org/>
