[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12599729#action_12599729
]
Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-49:
------------------------------------------
I see where you're coming from. But I'm left with the question of whether
_design is part of the document name or if _design is more of a namespace for
design documents.
Personally, I could see it going either way, but I haven't groked the internals
enough to know if there's a reason somewhere else that requires the _design as
an actual part of the name or not.
> A patch for the _design%2Fname hack.
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: COUCHDB-49
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-49
> Project: CouchDB
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: HTTP Interface
> Reporter: Paul Joseph Davis
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: design_url_escape.patch
>
>
> I think I've managed to make a trivial patch so that design documents can be
> accessed without the %2F hackery. Its pretty simple. Any request that starts
> with _design is joined back with it's url and then sent to
> handle_doc_request/5 methods.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
