+1 2008/7/4 Jan Lehnardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This might be me, but a native Erlang API would be nice. > For the simple reason to attract Erlang developers for the > project. They don't want to go through HTTP and they have > systems in place that are at a scale that we can only dream > of having available for testing. So we better give them what > they want. We might want to consider making a native Erlang > API and put the HTTP API on top of that to ensure feature > parity. This is, however one more level of indirection for the > folks that use the HTTP API which might be the majority of > users. Replication I think, should still go through HTTP, at > least initially. > > There is another reason beside testing to get more Erlang > developers to look at the code. The ASF Incubator is about > growing a (developer-) community around a project. So far, > we are still the four original developers which might suggest > that we better look for more support from within the Erlang > community (which I personally find to be nice and supportive) > to ensure that we can graduate from the Incubator. > > I hope you agree with me. > > Cheers > Jan > -- > > On Jul 2, 2008, at 09:08, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >> Hello everybody, >> this thread is meant to collect missing work items (features and >> bugs) for for our 1.0 release and a discussion about how to split >> them up between 0.9 and 1.0. >> >> Take it away: Damien. >> >> Cheers >> Jan >> -- >> > >
-- Saludos, José Manuel Peña
