On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Adam Kocoloski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 3, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Paul Davis wrote: > >> Not sure if I have this right in my head, but I AFAIK, replication is >> pushing from one db to _bulk_docs on another. We might want to have >> pull-oriented to account for things like NAT. > > Hi Paul, I think we have that covered. Replication can be > > local -> local > local -> remote > remote -> local > remote -> remote > > so if NAT is a problem just do a remote -> local, that is always initiate > the replication from the target DB. In that case it's all GET requests and > local writes. Let me know if I misunderstood you. Best, Adam >
I haven't played with replication at all. If there's replication via GET then I'm satisfied on that point. Thanks, Paul
