On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 05:23:36PM +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote: >> > You mean, written in Erlang? We don't want to add any more dependencies. >> >> That's excaltly why it could be in the release, not another tool /dependancy >> to install. > > No, what I mean is... the current tools are written in Python so we would need > an Erlang replacement for them. I was simply being explicit about what the > requirements would be. > >> > So, patches welcome! >> > >> >> Maybe I missed the point, I thought we speak about features for 1.0. I know >> that patches are welcome, thanks to remember me anyway. > > Hey, I'm just being jovial! If you really want this, you could send us a patch > and it would easily make the next release. >
I think i'm just tired to see such answer every time you speak about features in an opensource project ;) Anyway so the tool should be in erlang ? I take it. I would like if possible to not rely in http api for this one and just add a function that could be used in erlang shell and then call by any script. - benoît
