Heya,
On 28 Mar 2008, at 04:18, Soren Hilmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I have something running now (took a while as I wanted to run Java
remote
debugging, and Java insists on supplying a greating on stdout, so I
had to
put a handle_info clause in couch_db_update_notifier.erl to get it
working,
uhmm i like Erlang)
Now I am onto the using the design document approach, and it got me
thinking.
Now the code uses the database "couchdbfulltext" to store documents
with
databases to index. My initial though was then to put the design
documents
into this database, as it is close to the existing model. But why
not get rid
of the "couchdbfulltext" database entirely and put the design
documents in
the database to index, that way a database is indexed if it has the
specific
design document and otherwise not. Makes sense?
Yeah, totally. That is actually what I proposed earlier. Sorry if I
didn't make my point clear :)
I don't think requiring a separate database is a good idea.
Thanks for putting work into this!
Cheers
Jan
--
--Søren
--
Søren Hilmer, M.Sc., M.Crypt.
wideTrail Phone: +45 25481225
Pilevænget 41 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DK-8961 Allingåbro Web: www.widetrail.dk
