On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only thing with the FTI is that the future of how we couple > external software to couchdb is in a state of uncertainty. Between > plugins and action servers etc, I was going to wait till there was > something more steady in place before attacking this full force.
The main question for CouchDB's code is the stdio json protocol. Once that is nailed down, attaching various indexers should be straightforward. There are some design questions here, mostly to do with consistency with the rest of CouchDB. Eg: the view servers are fed a json array followed by a single newline, but search expects an object followed by two newlines. I haven't looked at the DbUpdateNotificationProcess but we should try to make that the same as well. I'm not sure if there are opportunities for code reuse here, but if there are we should take them. Chris -- Chris Anderson http://jchris.mfdz.com
