Oh and as to performance, at least running those on linux isn't that slow. It depends on your system, anything with more than one core will do fine.
Greetings, Ralf 2008/8/13 Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/8/2 Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Great idea for prototyping. Just keep in mind performance suffers >> quite a bit for view index time on VM vs. real. Not sure if you were >> planning on running in production that way, but wouldn't recommend it. > > OTOH using Windows in production for a server isn't the easiest, > cheapest nor safest thing to do anyway. > So developping on a VMWare image, (perhaps it's even wiser to go with > a server, console-only version). > > Adding bonus-effects: you can throw the whole server configuration in > source-control ;-) > When releasing producting ready version you just release the whole > server image ready to deploy. > > I use linux as a desktop, but i too am using virtualized images, that > I deploy when ready. > It depends on the sort of project, but if you need to things like > automatically convert certain uploaded file-types, etc. having the > whole server and installed programs under source-control really is the > way to go. > > Greetings, > Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen > >> >> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Demetrius Nunes >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> This is what I am using: >>> http://www.vmware.com/appliances/directory/1224 >>> >>> rgds. >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Jonathan Resnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> Makes sense.... why didn't I think of that. Thanks. >>>> >>>> j >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Demetrius Nunes >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> > Same here. >>>> > >>>> > On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Ronny Hanssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> I choose to set up a vmware image and do it in kubuntu. >>>> >> >>>> >> I just got the feeling that building it for Windows was looking for >>>> >> trouble... >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> ~Ronny >>>> >> >>>> >> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Jonathan Resnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> > Has anyone got CouchDB successfully built on Windows? I feel silly >>>> >> > asking this but for better or worse Windows is what I know. On the >>>> >> > other hand, the abiliy to get it going easily on Windows would open it >>>> >> > up to a whole new audience to try out. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > I have tried following the directions posted here >>>> >> > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/InstallingOnWindows, but I can't seem >>>> >> > to find binaries for SpiderMonkey anywhere on the Mozilla site, nor >>>> >> > have I had any luck compiling it from source (the *.mdp file is too >>>> >> > old to open in Visual Studio and NMAKE craps out with some >>>> >> > unintelliglible error). >>>> >> > >>>> >> > I have also searched the archives of this mailing list but haven't >>>> >> > come across anything relevant. Any ideas would be a great help. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > jon >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > ____________________________ >>>> > http://www.demetriusnunes.com >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ____________________________ >>> http://www.demetriusnunes.com >>> >> >
