Good point chris.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Chris Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Paul Davis > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Alternatively something like the following might work: >> >> Keep an eye on the specifics of _bulk_docs though. There have been >> requests to make it non-atomic, but I think in the face of something >> like this we might make non-atomic _bulk_docs a non-default or some >> such. > > I think the need for non-transaction bulk-docs will be obviated when > we have the failure response say which docs caused failure, that way > one can retry once to save all the non-conflicting docs, and then loop > back through to handle the conflicts. > > upshot: I bet you can count on bulk docs being transactional. > > > -- > Chris Anderson > http://jchris.mfdz.com >
