On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Oct 8, 2008, at 9:59 , Nick Johnson wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Chris Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:40 AM, Nick Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> The list won't actually allow people to post (it's admin-posting-only), >>>> >>> but >>> >>>> I've put up a welcome message on the front page informing people of >>>> this. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Thanks - I was scared to try! >>> >>> I guess I'll no longer feel like a super-hero with my secret ability >>> to search gmail archives to find old CouchDB posts. Ah, the internet, >>> letting everyone be super-heros. :) >>> >> >> >> Unfortunately, you can't do that anymore, either - Jan deleted the >> original >> google group. >> > > > I think is referring to searching couchdb-user with Google. > > In my defence: The old archives didn't have much relevant > information anymore and Noah asked me to nuke the group > to avoid user-confusion, which your archive introduces again. I've done my best to make it absolutely clear where the 'real' list is, and that this is just an archive. > > (Told you on IRC, though). I'm not saying a searchable archive > is not useful but I really think this should be done on the ASF- > Infrastructure end. If done right this will benefit all list archives, > not just us. It'd be really cool, if someone could look into this: > > Any takers? I emailed infra@, and they told me to fix mod_mbox if I wanted anything to change. Not saying this to discourage anyone else from trying, just letting you know what the status is. > > Cheers > Jan > -- >
