Hi Pito. I've heard your name many times in the past, usually
mentioned in a positive manner :) I'm not sure we've met, but if so it
was probably when I was at Iris or Kubi. I've been working on CouchDB
since early 2005, but I've been in NC that whole time.
Welcome to the CouchDB community!
-Damien
On Nov 13, 2008, at 1:43 PM, R. Pito Salas wrote:
Damien
I think you and I met several years ago at a Starbucks or something,
didn't we? You were working on CouchDB even then? You used to work
at Iris? Or am I mixing you up with someone else?
Anyway, pretty cool the traction you've gotten with it.
Congratulations!
-- Pito
On Nov 12, 2008, at 6:12 PM, Damien Katz wrote:
I don't know about Peepcode, but I'm guessing the library is
expecting a object, and looks to be iterating over your string
somehow thinking it's an object with the offsets as keys and the
individual characters as values..
Try giving it something like {body:"abc"}.
On Nov 12, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Pito Salas wrote:
I am experimenting with CouchDb, via PeepCode.
I am finding that in the _utils browser interface, the values are
rendered in a way that is different from the PeepCode and before
spending too much time on a bad install I thought I'd ask if anyone
has an explanation, and whether I should just ignore the
difference or
there's actually something broken here. Take a look at the
screenshots
and you see that:
values like "abc" are not accepted for a field (JSON error)
values like ["abc"] are accepted, but then are spewed back as 0
{"0":"a","1":"b","2":"c","3":"d"}
Comments?
