On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Chris Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think I've had a change of heart. Damien argues that people would > use validation-writes to generate timestamps. But the timestamps can > be wrong/faked (on remote nodes) and there's no way to validate (on > replication) that they are correct. So putting stamp-capability into > the validation functions would setup false expectations. Apparently it > caused all sorts of trouble in Notes.
Would this validate, then, my idea for a 2nd "meta-data db" that only the server had POST/PUT/DELETE rights to, but users could GET from? -j.
