1,000 hrs? Airframe and Engine? If that's original 1,000 hrs on engine, I'd guess it's about due for OH. Unlike an automobile, higher time doesn't seem to make a great impact on the value of an aircraft. I'd go for the low time engine, all else (interior,exterior,equipment) being equal.
Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Coupers, > What are your thoughts on the following hypothetical situations: > There are two model 415-C coupes. One has been flying regularly, up to > date on AD's and current on maintenance but has about 2400 hrs logged, > which seems about normal. Recent overhaul and current annual. Unusual > stress crack in belly repaired and signed off by FAA 20 years ago and > has beautiful interior/exterior with professionally updated panel, lots > of avionics, metal wings and paint. > The other one hasn't been regularly flown for a long time but is current > on AD's and maintenance and has less than 1000 hours, which seems really > low. Original panel, new fabric wings, polished exterior, current > annual. Wonderful interior/exterior with lots of spare parts. Very > original. > Benefits vs. downsides of each? > Dave in Atlanta > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ps: Georgia when's your next lesson? > > __________________________________________________________________________ __ ____ > To unsubscribe from this list please send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___________________________________________________________ > T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16 > Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics --------------------------------- to unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___________________________________________________________ T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16 Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
