On 05/03/98 00:33:50 you wrote:
>
>     I am presently conducting an ercoupe search.  Numerous blanks exits
in my
>coupe knowledge--could someone enlighten me?
>1.  Does one model of coupe perform substantially better than another?
Not
>that any coupe is a real performer,  but which is best?
>2.  What is with the mixture control,  or lack thereof?  Can the control
be
>reinstalled?
>3.  Is the rudder pedal installation worthwhile?  If so can the nosewheel
>interlink be configured to behave more like a typical trike installation?
>4.  Which model carries the most useful load (I mean legally)?
>5.  Are any STCs available to install carb jets for a bit more HP?  How
about
>an O-200 installation?
>      Will be looking at 2 coupes tomorrow.   The more I look and read
about
>this Macy's marvel, the more amused and fascinated I am by the design
>ingenuity and marketing objective.  A chicken in every pot and a coupe in
>every garage.
>
>

>Tnx coupers& 73
>

>D Reid
>
>

Welcome to the list.  I can't answer most of your questions, but I can
give you some limited 
insight. As you probably know from your research, the coupe is broken into
3 general 
catagories; The "Ercoupe", the "Forney" and the "Alon".  The Ercoupe has
both peddle and non-
peddle models, is older and more maintenance prone, and usually has a 75
or 85 hp engine.  I 
understand that the 85hp is a significant improvement over the 75hp.  The
Alon has a 90hp engine 
that is very reliable and provides adequate power for two people and full
loads.  The Alon has 
also solved some of the maintenance problems and general design
deficiencies found in the 
Ercoupe.  Some people prefer peddles in their coupe, but those without
them say why bother.  
They are able to land in strong cross winds and steer just fine with the
yoke.  I would be more 
interested in the other condition indicators than in getting a coupe with
peddles.  The Alon, 
and I suppose the Ercoupe, has a climb prop available, as well as a cruise
prop.  Most of the 
Alon owners I have met have a climb prob and like it just fine.  My Alon
has a climb prob and my 
flying buddy's Alon has a cruise prop.  I can out climb him, and my
takeoff is a bit shorter, 
but at the same RPM he will pull away from me.  But the difference in
cruise is not enough to 
make me change to a cruise prop.  The Alon has a bigger useful load
(1450lbs) than the standard 
Ercoupe, although modifications to the Ercoupe will increase the useful
load.  I think it has to 
do with landing loads more than lift ability.  Many people have installed
the 0200 engine in the 
coupes, which I think would be a good idea if the 85hp was due to be
overhauled or replaced.  If 
you have the 90hp engine, the increase wouldn't help much (I think).  I
don't know anything 
about carb jets, but several other coupers on the list have 0200
conversions. Check with Charles 
McKinney on Forneys.  They have a neat "fifties" look to them, I think,
and have been upgraded 
some from the Ercoupes. 

I am a bit biased because I have an Alon, but I intentionally set out to
buy an Alon over an 
Ercoupe.  My mechanical and general repair skills suck, so I figured a
newer plane with less 
likelyhood of problems like missing screws, worn wiring, scratched
plastic, etc (to say nothing 
of real problems) was the way for me to go.  But they are harder to find
and generally cost 2-3 
thousand dollars more than an Ercoupe.  You will also spend more money
upgrading the Ercoupe 
than you will upgrading the Alon.  However, there are thousands of
Ercoupes providing lots of 
fun, and they are much better looking than a piper or cessna!  If you
haven't joined the Ercoupe 
Owners Club, you might try hooking up with someone in your area and
borrowing their last two 
newsletters.  There are usually several Ercoupes and perhaps an Alon
listed in the newsletter 
for sale.  I think there was one Ercoupe listed at $25,000 and advertised
as one of the best in 
the country.

Good luck in your search. Let us know what you end up doing.

Ken Doyle
Springfield, Mo
Alon N5477E

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to