----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----
My previous Coupe had a C-85 and this one has an 0-200 in it. The only con I can think of is the 0-200 uses a bit more fuel. I have a better rate of climb, a 60 amp alternator, key start, engine mounted vacuum pump which eliminates venturis. The STC requires an electric fuel pump. This eliminates the sometimes troublesome mechanical pump. Parts are more readily available, this includes complete used engines. In my opinion, if a person were faced with needing a complete overhaul of a C-85, and could locate a firewall forward from a Cessna 150, the 0-200 would be a very viable option. In addition to the STC, you would need the 0-200, a matching prop, regulator and plumbing for the vacuum system, regulator for the alternator if so equipped, electric fuel pump. Lord engine mounts, modifications to the cowl, etc. So if a person were considering an 0-200 just for the additional horsepower, those ponies would be fairly costly. However if you had a runout C-85 to sell for a core and could find an 0-200 firewall forward with some decent time left then it wouldn't be too costly. Just my opinion. Cheers: Paul N2273H > Can anyone enlighten me a little on the pros and cons of the o-200 > conversion for the Ercoupe? __________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from this list please send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ____________________________________________________________ T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
