Dennis wrote: >Hello I just realized that some of you might object to the attachment _ sorry !! I was just thinking how neat this is and wanted you all to hear. >I'm sorry maybe the tech group will like it. I'll wait for the responses >here first.
No problem this time. But multiple repetitions will result in multiple facetiously broken fingers, but we'll do it in a friendly manner. For my new cable modem, which I just got last week (brag), it was a hiccup. With my dial-up telephone line modem, getting 3.0 kB/sec download, it would have been an extra three minutes before I could read my mail. With 350 members on the list, it's likely that 10 or 30 would find it awkward to receive such a download on any random day. A review for the general group: It's great to distribute things like this and big, high resolution pictures if you post them on your website. Then e-mail us the URL (URL means web address -- Universal Resource Locator). Hint: if you write the entire URL including the http part, with many browsers we can just click on the address and our browser will go get it while we continue to read our mail. For example: http://www.flash.net/~dmprosvc/dave/whybuy.htm As always, executable attachments (.exe or .com files) may contain viruses and I guarantee I will delete them unopened. Sorry to be so long winded. Just wanted to let you know that we ain't mad, it's a friendly thing to share a newly found treat like that. Yet I wanted to let everyone (who hasn't been around this block before) know why we don't want to include big attachments (or executable programs) in postings, especially to e-mail lists. -- Ed Burkhead Peoria, Ill. Ercoupe N3802H, 415-D __________________________________________________________________________ ______ To unsubscribe from this list please send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _____________________________________________________________ Who will win the Oscars? Spout off on our Entertainment list! http://www.topica.com/lists/showbiztalk
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
