I was! :-) Actually, I had sent Georgia private e-mail noting that the 172 was 'a tub' compared to the responsiveness of our Ercoupes.
I have a lot of 172 hours, so I get to call it a tub. Mind you, I wouldn't turn down one for free. But I sure don't find them 'recreational!' Greg At 03:43 PM 2/24/00 -0800, Georgia Trehey wrote: >Dear Coupers, > >Just in case my attempt at humor with my above subject title was >micsonstrued, I was not badmouthing the Cessna 172. I am hardly in the >position to be making comparative statements about any planes. > >Actually, I just love airplanes. I'm sure they all have their good and >bad points. > >Like I said before, I am just so happy to be able to learn to fly. So >whichever plane or planes I learn in will be my magic carpet to >wonderland. > >Cheers, >Georgia > > >_________________________________________________________________________ __ >_____ >To unsubscribe from this list please send >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >_____________________________________________________________ >Want to find the best email lists? Check out the Topica 20! >http://www.topica.com/topica20 __________________________________________________________________________ ______ To unsubscribe from this list please send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _____________________________________________________________ Want to find the best email lists? Check out the Topica 20! http://www.topica.com/topica20
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
