----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- I was just wondering about that. I have wondered if it is neccessary to change the pads on the mount when converting to the O200. By the way my conical mounts are cracked after running only 60 hours. I am not going to worry about them. I think the torque in the book is too much. Mine ran smoother when they were loosened up. Besides, because of the way the rubber collapses, it is near impossible to get a real exact torque. That was my experience, anyhow. Glen Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Coupers, > I've been plagued with my rubber engine mount bushings (conical type... > C-85 style) wearing and cracking rapidly. Everything the last three > times has > been done by the book, proper torques, new "factory" hardware (washers, > rubber bushings and bolts). I am changing the engine this weekend and > while I > have the new C-85 conical mount bushings, my AP/IA wants to know if > anyone > has used the later model LORD mounts that is used on the C-90 / O-200 > engines. He thinks the cases are the same on the C-90 as the C-85 so it > might > work, although I've never heard of anyone doing this. Any info is, of > course > much appreciated. > Andy Pomeroy 2417H Arlington, WA
__________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from this list please send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___________________________________________________________ T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16 Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
