Sam Varshavchik schrieb:
> > What do think is the better way with respect to the IMAP protocol:
> >
> > 1. Define an implementation dependent escape sequence if a user uses
> the
> > delimiter character in a mailbox name or hierarchy level
> >
> > 2. Make the implementation be configurable to set the delimiter.
> >
> > In my opinion 1 is the better approach because 2 just shifts the
> problem
> > from one character to another.
>
> Neither:
>
> 3. Define a convention that all clients should use to escape the
> hierarchy
> delimiter character if the client wants to specify it as part of the
> folder
> name.
OK,
As I could find out courier replaces dots in a hiearchy level with a space.
00000005 LIST "" "#shared.*"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "#shared.testu...@example com.berta"
. #shared.testu...@example com.berta
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "." "#shared.testu...@example com"
. #shared.testu...@example com, no select
00000005 OK LIST completed
Is that reversible?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
Courier-imap mailing list
Courier-imap@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-imap
