Alessandro Vesely writes: > Sam Varshavchik writes: >> Your patch does not make any sense. Instead of returning -1, you're >> returning 0, and changing it to -1 in a wrapper function. > > Exactly: that way existing filters don't get broken. > >> In other words, your patch does absolutely nothing. > > Not correct. Since the patch also modifies libfilter.h, it allows > a sysv filter to call lf_sysv_accept directly and get 0 to exit, > or -1 for error, as documented therein.
Your patch makes no difference as far as the rest of the Courier code is concerned. -- Sam _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
