On Don, 24 Jan 2002, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > That code is correct. I see nothing wrong with it.
> Hint: posting a claim that something isn't working correctly, without > showing an example, followed by a patch whose meaning is not clear, is not > going to fly. Hi! sorry if my first mail was not understandable enough, but here another try. insted of using courier as MTA the tool reformime does the same, so i'm using it instead of passing through SMTP. # cat mail | reformime-orig -r > mail-reformed # diff -u 50 mail mail-reformed > diff not to flam the list, see http://www.ashberg.de/courier/mail http://www.ashberg.de/courier/mail-reformed http://www.ashberg.de/courier/diff there you can see in line 46 an inserted newline. The signed part itself isn't touched, but exactly after that part there is that newline, and that's the problem. when using the version which my patch applied that newline can't be found, and the signature is correct, see http://www.ashberg.de/courier/mail-reformed-patched and http://www.ashberg.de/courier/mail-diff-patched to verify that signature you can't use 'reformime -e -s 1.1', because also the MIME-headers of 1.1 are signed, not only the content. You have to use an PGP/MIME compatible MUA, mutt -f mail[[-reformed]-patched], then only mail and mail-reformed-patched shows good signature. I hope that information is enough. > If there's a problem, it must lie elsewhere. It'snot here. not my opinion. Using sendmail there are no problems. And i think this is not mutt-specific, eudora shows the same, i don't know other PGP/MIME-MUA's. Kind Regards Folke _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
