On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 02:31:57PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote: > > So the excuse I get for Courier vs. Postfix is "security." And the > > completely subjective comment, "I don't think Courier is as secure as > > Postfix." > > What your admin may be saying is "I don't know how to secure Courier, but I > have a pretty good handle on securing Postfix." Or maybe you're getting the
No matter what - experience *always* counts for a lot. I like Courier a lot, but if I had to choose between running Courier with no experience - or Postfix with experience - I'd take Postfix. [replace "Courier" and "Postfix" with basically any product name. Still the same] BTW: Courier is more than a MTA (unlike Postfix, Sendmail and Qmail) - it includes authentication modules, POP, IMAP, listserver and Web components too. So chances are, there are more problems with Courier than those others (sorry Sam ;-). That's just a probability issue of course - no proof so far (touch wood ;-) -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
