Hello all:
Joshua E Warchol wrote:
> I'm working on a patch to courier-imap that will do exactly what
> you're thinking. I've got the same problem. Basically Sam (head
> courier guy) isn't in the same situation we are. His way of thinking
> is that if the user's marked it deleted, it's deleted (some clients
> don't even display messages marked as deleted). I don't claim to
understand
> his thinking on this, but he did seem willing to look at a patch to
make
> this behaviour optional. So I'm working on that. No time table at this
> point however.
We've made a patch solving this problem. The only changes we had to
do
consisted on commenting and uncommenting source code in order to check
the
quota frequently and not to modify it when a user marks a message as
deleted
but when he effectively deletes it.
In order to offer the user his real quota use we made a script which
checks de information directly from the system.
If anyone of you is interested on it tell me and I'll be pleased to
send
the patch and/or more information.
Sorry for my english.
--
############################################################
Raul Caballero Ortega
Grupo de Sistemas Unix
Sistemas Centrales
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tfno: 91-6249986
############################################################
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
