I doubt anyone cares about this, but i feel that it's at least worth saying. The wait() bug that Sam refers to is not the same bug that is tickled by the configure script.
It seems silly to search for a bug and find something vaguely similar to the problem mentioned, and then blame it on that bug. The solaris patch offered by sun has no relevance on the problem with courier. It is a different issue. On a side note, i've been using courier in a high-load (approx 5-10 POP requests per second) environment for about a year now, and I have not experienced any issues. Your mileage may vary. eric On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Scott Pestana writes: > > > Does anyone know if this situation will cause a problem once this > > goes into production? > > Yes it will, under extremely high load. Since the test script managed to > trigger a bug before the 248 days are up, it's only a matter of time before > you get nailed. I don't have anything firm that indicates what exactly is > broken, just a general note stating to apply all of Sun's recommended > patches to Solaris. > > > -- > Sam > > > _______________________________________________ > courier-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users > _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
