On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Ralph Doncaster writes: > > the current courier, since the authpam code still uses libc getpwnam (in > > the preauthpam.c). This was a bit of a surprise, considering the > > documentation strongly discourages against using authshadow (which uses > > getpwnam). Am I missing something here? > > passwd/shadow begins to break down when the user count begins climbing into > thousands.
In other words there is no technical reason to avoid authshadow if authpam is just using pam_pwdb or pam_unix, right? -Ralph _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
